In a review I am writing with a collaborator, I am reviewing a bit of Higuchi's proposal (introduced in this paper) for a modified norm. A couple of papers into inspire, I found a very nice set of papers (see this, this and this) that indicated that there was a little more to the story of the group averaging proposal. It was first initiated by Moncrief in his paper ``Space-Time Symmetries and Linearization Stability of the Einstein Equations. 2", where it was conjectured that the infinite norm of a Hilbert space could be modified into a finite norm by dividing by the volume of the group. In the example of the Hilbert space proposal by Suvrat et al [2303.16315], where the asymptotic solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation are of the form
\Psi [g, \chi ]=e^{iS[g, \chi ]}\mathcal{Z}[g, \chi ]\;,
one has to take into account of the Gauss law, which requires that these WDW states are invariant under the de Sitter isometry group G_{dS}. These are of the form (see the paper for a nice discussion about this and a more proper description of how these states are found to be invariant)
- Translations: \tilde{x}^{a}=x^{a}+\epsilon ^{a},
- Rotations: \tilde{x}^{a}=R^{a}_{b}x^{b},
- Dilatations: \tilde{x}^{a}=\lambda x^{a} and
- Special conformal transformations: \tilde{x}^{a}=\frac{x^{a}-\beta ^{a}|x|^{a}}{1-2(\beta \cdot x)+|\beta |^{2}|x|^{2}}.
For the t coordinate, the above transformations can be found correspondingly. However, if one defines a ``seed" state built on top of the Euclidean vacuum state |0\rangle (called the Bunch-Davies state) by
|\mathrm{seed}\rangle =\int dx_{1}\dots dx_{n}\psi (x_{1}\dots x_{n})\chi (x_{1})\dots \chi (x_{n})|0\rangle \;,
where \psi (x_{n}) is a ``smearing" function with a compact support and \chi (x_{n}) are a collection of n massive scalar fields, we see that the only state invariant under G_{dS} (imposed as a constraint) is that of |0\rangle . Due to the smearing function, and the nature of the group, the norm \langle \Psi , \Psi \rangle is infinite. This can be interpreted as forming a one-state subspace \mathcal{H}^{G_{dS}} of G_{dS}-invariant states from the full Hilbert space \mathcal{H}. To correct this, one uses Higuchi's proposal, which proved Moncrief's conjecture, and uses group averaging to define a modified norm
\langle \langle \Psi , \Psi \rangle \rangle =\frac{1}{\mathrm{vol}(SO(1, D+1))}\langle \Psi , \Psi \rangle \;,
where \langle \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \rangle denotes the modified norm (this is somewhat against the usual convention of (\cdot , \cdot ), but I will be using this in a different sense below). What one is doing here is defining the space of states formed by group averaging under G_{dS}:
|\Psi \rangle =\int _{g\in G_{dS}}dg \; U|\mathrm{seed}\rangle \;,
where dg denotes the Haar measure and U(g) is a unitary operator. One then has a finite norm set of states which are invariant under G_{dS} isometry group.
In the sense of Refined Algebraic Quantization (abbreviated to RAQ), the whole consideration above reduces into a mathematical problem: given an auxiliary Hilbert space
\mathcal{H}_{aux} and a corresponding set of
*-algebra of observables
\mathcal{A}_{obs}, one has to find the ``physical" Hilbert space
\mathcal{H}_{phys} such that the inner product satisfies the finiteness constraint, and so that the inner product on
\mathcal{H}_{aux} is related to
\mathcal{H}_{phys}. The constraints in the above construction are that the states are invariant under
G_{dS}, and essentially what we have done is to find the
physical Hilbert space, which is a subspace of the initial (in the RAQ terminology, auxiliary) Hilbert space. In the sense of an
\eta -mapping as discussed in
Marolf's paper, one would find a measure so that the following modified norm converges:
(\Psi , \Psi )_{\eta }=\int _{g\in G_{dS}} dg\; \langle \Psi |U|\Psi \rangle \;,
where (\cdot , \cdot )_{\eta } refers to the modified inner product defined in terms of \eta . Group averaging in the above sense of WDW states becomes the norm (\cdot , \cdot )_{\eta }\to \langle \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \rangle of \mathcal{H}_{phys}\to \mathcal{H}^{G_{dS}}.
No comments:
Post a Comment